Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Loyal08>

    AFC Wimbledon VS Stockport County

    England League 1
    Analysis More Tips
    AFC Wimbledon
    AFC Wimbledon
    Stockport County
    Stockport County
    Further Reading
    • semotipster
      semotipster
      TEAM ANALYSIS: wimbledon last 5 matches 1 draw 4 loss...they have bad form...they will play at home and their home-performance is also unstable(from 5 matches 2 win 1 draw 2 loss)... their home goal difference is 0 from 5 matches... stockport county last 5 matches 3 win 2 draw...they have enough form...they will play at away and their away-performance is also bad(from 5 match 2 draw 3 loss)...their away goal difference is -4 from 5 match... MATCH ANALYSIS: main factor is overall performances, why to be selected this bet...wimbledon won their home matches with 1 goals difference on the other hand stockport county lost their away matches with 1 goals difference... CONCLUSION: Betting Types Advises: -asian handicap: wimbledon +0.50
      AH
      ENG L1 AFC Wimbledon - Stockport County
    • Phadet Detpha
      Phadet Detpha
      Match Analysis: AFC Wimbledon vs Stockport County 2026: AFC Wimbledon home; - Recent form: very poor - Multiple losses in a row - Often not scoring at all Last 6 games: 0 wins in 6, Several games lost 0–1 or 0–3. Key issue: 4 straight matches without scoring. Strength: Home support can keep games tight early. Weakness: Very low scoring, Defensive errors under pressure, Poor confidence. Stockport County away: - Recent form: very strong - Unbeaten runs in stretches - Wins like 3–0, 3–0, 2–1 Scoring: Around 2+ goals per game recently. Defensive record: Solid, especially vs lower teams. Strength: - Strong attack - Better squad quality - High confidence Weakness: Away games can sometimes be tighter. AFC Wimbledon problems - No goals in multiple recent games - Weak attacking output - Confidence very low Stockport strengths - Much better attacking quality - Superior squad depth - Dominant H2H record - Strong recent momentum Risk factors - Away game pressure - Possible low-scoring gr
      O/U
      ENG L1 AFC Wimbledon - Stockport County
    • BET ENSURED
      BET ENSURED Won 11/12
      AFC Wimbledon Stats In the last games, AFC Wimbledon has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 20%, while their draw rate stands at 20%. On the other hand, they lost 60% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 10% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 30% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, AFC Wimbledon scores 1 goals per game and concedes 2 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 10% of the games, and the team scored in 50% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 20% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 40% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 10% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 20%, and losing with BTTS in 10%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 0% of the games, 1 goal in 40% of the games, 2 goals in 10% of the games, 3 goals in 20% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 30% of the games. Stockport Stats In their recent games, Stockport has demonstrated var
      1x2
      ENG L1 AFC Wimbledon - Stockport County
    More Recommend
    • Tromso IL VS Lillestrom I've crafted a long - term, high - quality product tailored for my followers. In terms of recent performance, Tromsø has shown superiority over Lillestrøm. Tromsø's average shot - on - target rate in the last five games is 34%, while Lillestrøm's is only 26%. The expected goals (xG) efficiency of Tromsø stands at 1.25, compared to Lillestrøm's 0.98. When it comes to key passes, Tromsø has a success rate of 68%, leading Lillestrøm's 52%. The passing value index in the front 30 - meter area is 1.15, which creates more threats. In midfield control, Tromsø dominates with a ball - possession rate of 58%, leaving Lillestrøm with only 42%. The speed of Tromsø's counter - attacks reaches 3.2 m/s, surpassing the league average. In terms of physical exertion, Tromsø runs 108 km in a game, and the proportion of high - intensity sprints is 27%, while Lillestrøm only has 19%. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming
      AH
      NOR D1 Tromso IL - Lillestrom
    • Sarpsborg 08 VS Bodo Glimt I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable information source, offering a long - term high - quality product for my followers. Sapporo has shown better shooting efficiency in recent matches. In the last five games, their average shot - on - target conversion rate is 18.5%, which is higher than Bodø/Glimt's 12.3%. Their xG efficiency reaches 1.12, 0.31 higher than their opponents. On the other hand, Bodø/Glimt has an edge in passing. Their key pass success rate is 78%, leading by 11 percentage points. The value of their forward passes is 0.85 per pass, 0.22 higher than Sapporo. In terms of midfield pressure, Sapporo has a midfield pressing intensity of 8.2 times per 90 minutes. Their transition attack speed is 12.4m/s, 1.6m/s faster than Bodø/Glimt. Both teams cover over 112km in a game. However, Sapporo makes 32 high - intensity sprints, 17 more than Bodø/Glimt. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football
      O/U
      NOR D1 Sarpsborg 08 - Bodo Glimt
    • Al-Nassr VS Al-Ettifaq I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable information service. I've crafted a high - quality long - term product for my followers. In terms of offensive performance, over the recent matches, Al Nassr's offensive conversion rate in the last 5 games is 28%, which is lower than Al Ettifaq's 35%. Al Nassr's xG efficiency is 0.78 per game, inferior to Al Ettifaq's 1.12 per game. When it comes to passing, Al Ettifaq has a 42% success rate of key passes, 11 percentage points higher than Al Nassr. The value of Al Ettifaq's forward passes reaches 3.2 times per game. In midfield control, Al Nassr has a 61% ball - possession rate, but its conversion speed is only 0.8 m/s. On the other hand, Al Ettifaq achieves a pressing counter - attack through 10.3 km of running and 18 high - intensity sprints per game on average. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming In this Saudi Pro League encounter, I'm favoring the a
      AH
      SPL Al-Nassr - Al-Ettifaq
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.