Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Apoorv>

    West Ham United VS Wolves

    English Premier League
    Analysis More Tips
    West Ham United
    West Ham United
    Wolves
    Wolves
    Further Reading
    • Loyal08
      Loyal08 Won 8/8
      West Ham United VS Wolves I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable information source. I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for my followers. Looking at the statistics, in terms of the offensive finishing conversion rate this season, West Ham United has an average of 9.8%, while Wolverhampton Wanderers stands at 11.2%. Moreover, Wolverhampton Wanderers has a better xG efficiency of 0.85 compared to West Ham United's 0.79. When it comes to the key pass success rate, West Ham United edges slightly ahead with 58%. However, Wolverhampton Wanderers shows a stronger performance in the front - field passing value, reaching 1.32 times per 90 minutes, 0.28 times more than their opponents. In the midfield control, West Ham United occupies 54% of the area. But Wolverhampton Wanderers has an edge in the transition speed, being 0.5 seconds faster at 3.2 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Wolverhampton Wanderers runs an average of 112.3 km per game, and thei
      AH
      ENG PR West Ham United - Wolves
    • Qwerty B
      Qwerty B
      West Ham United datang ke pertandingan ini dengan kondisi yang kurang ideal setelah tersingkir dari ajang Piala FA usai bermain imbang melawan Leeds United dan kalah dalam adu penalti. Dalam laga tersebut, mereka sebenarnya tampil cukup agresif dengan jumlah peluang yang banyak dan bahkan mampu menyamakan kedudukan di menit akhir. Namun, masalah utama West Ham belakangan ini terletak pada lini pertahanan yang kerap gagal menjaga keunggulan. Dalam beberapa pertandingan terakhir, mereka hampir selalu kebobolan, menunjukkan adanya celah yang belum terselesaikan meski lini serang tetap mampu berkontribusi. Di sisi lain, Wolverhampton Wanderers juga menunjukkan performa yang belum stabil setelah bermain imbang melawan Brentford di laga terakhir. Tim ini memiliki kecenderungan terlibat dalam pertandingan terbuka dengan banyak gol, tetapi pertahanan mereka juga sering kali menjadi titik lemah. Dalam enam pertandingan terakhir, Wolves hampir selalu kebobolan, yang memperlihatkan bahwa keseimba
      1x2
      ENG PR West Ham United - Wolves
    • Uefa Champions
      Uefa Champions
      * Analysis: West Ham United vs Wolves* _Premier League – Friday, April 10, 2026, London Stadium_ *1. Team Condition* *West Ham United* - *Position*: Relegation zone, can climb out with a win. Points: 29 - *Form*: Improving since January. 15 of their 29 points this season came after the new year. Just lost on penalties in the FA Cup vs Leeds after a 2-goal comeback in stoppage time - *Key*: Crysencio Summerville back as a starter - he scored in 4 straight games & got the winner vs Fulham before his injury. Mateus Fernandes starting to shine in midfield - *Problem*: Only 1 home clean sheet this season, xGA 1.62 per game *Wolves* - *Position*: Bottom of the table, 17 points. Almost certainly relegated - *Form*: Actually on the rise. 4th in the form table over last 4 games, unbeaten in 3, beat Arsenal, Liverpool, Aston Villa. Unbeaten in last 3 games - *Problem*: Conceded the most in the league: 36 goals. xGA 1.56 per game - *Strength*: Have become a “banana skin” for big teams. Edwa
      1x2
      ENG PR West Ham United - Wolves
      1
    More Recommend
    • Paris FC VS Monaco Paris FC has been in good form recently. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.5%, higher than Monaco's 12.3%. The xG efficiency value of Paris FC is 1.02, significantly better than Monaco's 0.89. In terms of key passes, Paris FC's success rate is 73%, while Monaco's is 61%. In the front 30 - meter area, Paris FC creates 2.4 threatening opportunities per game through passing, compared to Monaco's 1.7. When it comes to midfield control, Paris FC holds 58% of the possession. They also have an advantage in conversion speed, with a 0.8 - second - per - time edge. Their average running distance per game is 112 km, including 32 high - intensity sprints, which is 11% more than Monaco. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming Monaco's defensive performance is concerning. Their tackle success rate stands at 52%, lower than Paris FC's 63%. They also have an average of 18 interceptions per game, fewer than Paris FC's 25. More
      O/U
      FRA D1 Paris FC - Monaco
    • Augsburg VS TSG Hoffenheim In recent head - to - head matches, both Augsburg and Hoffenheim have shown high offensive efficiency. Their average offensive conversion rates are both over 15%. Augsburg has an xG value of 1.8, indicating a strong offensive threat. Meanwhile, Hoffenheim has a remarkable 68% success rate of key forward passes. In the midfield, the control abilities of the two teams are quite similar. However, Hoffenheim has an edge in the speed of counter - attacks, with an average sprint distance 1.2 kilometers more per game. On the defensive side, Augsburg has a better tackle rate, with 14.3 tackles per game. But Hoffenheim's high - pressure pressing in the front - field creates more turnovers. In the last five games, both teams have covered a total running distance of over 110 kilometers, and the proportion of high - intensity sprints is more than 35%. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming Hoffenheim's defensive statistics
      O/U
      GER D1 Augsburg - TSG Hoffenheim
    • AS Roma VS Pisa Rome has been in excellent form recently, especially on the offensive end. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 19.8%, 6.3 percentage points higher than Pisa. The xG efficiency of Rome is 0.87, 1.4 times that of Pisa. In terms of key passes, Rome's success rate is 62%, with an 18% lead over Pisa. The passing value in the front 30 - meter area of Rome is 0.45, 1.7 times that of their opponent. When it comes to midfield control, Rome's passing success rate is 88%, suppressing Pisa by 12%. They can launch fast - attacks every 12 seconds, showing a high - speed conversion ability. In terms of physical performance, the total running distance of Rome's team is 112 km, 12% more than Pisa. The number of high - intensity sprints of Rome is 38 times, 24 more than Pisa. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming In terms of defensive performance, Roma has a clear edge. They lead in both tackles (18 times) and interceptions (12 times
      AH
      ITA D1 AS Roma - Pisa
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.