Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Apoorv>

    Pakistan VS Myanmar

    AFC Asian Cup
    Analysis More Tips
    Pakistan
    Pakistan 1
    2 Myanmar
    Myanmar
    Further Reading
    • VIP100%
      VIP100%
      Pakistan VS Myanmar Pakistan has been in a slump recently. In their last five games, they only managed one win, two draws, and two losses, which is far from satisfactory. Adding to their woes, the team's key central defender is suspended due to accumulated yellow cards and will miss this match. This will have a significant impact on their back - line. The substitute defenders lack experience, and it's highly likely that there will be problems with the smoothness of the defensive connection. On the offensive end, Pakistan struggles to score goals. They average less than one goal per game. The forwards are in poor form with low shooting efficiency. They rely too much on crosses from the flanks, but their ability to make runs in the middle is weak, making it difficult to create effective scoring opportunities. Defensively, they concede 1.5 goals per game on average, indicating numerous holes in their defense. Myanmar has shown an upturn in form. In their last five matches, they've secured
      AH
      AFC Pakistan 1-2 Myanmar
    • Americas Time
      Americas Time
      Pakistan VS Myanmar Pakistan's home - field performance has been truly disappointing from a statistical perspective. In all their previous matches, the win rate stands at a dismal 0%, with a 20% draw rate and a staggering 80% loss rate. The team has scored only 2 goals while conceding 31, resulting in a goal difference of -29. With an average of just 0.2 goals per game, their attacking end is extremely lackluster. Moreover, they also have poor statistics in average corner kicks (0.7) and yellow cards (1.6) per game. On the other hand, Myanmar presents a more balanced performance. When facing the same home - away situation, they have a 40% win rate, 20% draw rate, and 40% loss rate. The team can perform steadily both at home and away. They have scored 11 goals and conceded 20, with a goal difference of -9. Their average of 1.1 goals per game indicates a relatively prominent attacking ability. Additionally, their statistics in corner kicks (1.8) and yellow cards (1.6) per game show a mor
      O/U
      AFC Pakistan 1-2 Myanmar
    • 343
      343
      Pakistan VS Myanmar Pakistan has been experiencing significant fluctuations in their recent form. In their last five matches, they have yet to secure a victory, with a record of two draws and three losses. During this period, they have only scored one goal while conceding nine, indicating a weak offensive scoring ability and obvious defensive vulnerabilities. Currently ranked third in the group, Pakistan's chances of advancing are looking grim, which has had a certain impact on the players' morale. The team's key player, Rahim Nabi, has only scored one goal this season, leaving the offensive end lacking strong support. Meanwhile, Aramgir Ghazi, as an offensive organizer, has only provided one assist, showing a lack of creativity. Fortunately, there are no major injury concerns within the team. However, the overall competitive state of the players is mediocre, and the tactical execution is not up to par. Myanmar has shown signs of improvement in recent form. They ended their losing stre
      AH
      AFC Pakistan 1-2 Myanmar
    More Recommend
    • PSV Eindhoven VS FC Utrecht In this match, Eindhoven shows a clear edge over Utrecht in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive efficiency, Eindhoven has a remarkable average offensive conversion rate of 25% this season, while Utrecht only manages 15%. The xG efficiency of Eindhoven stands at 1.23, significantly higher than Utrecht's 0.91. When it comes to passing, Eindhoven's key pass success rate is 75%, compared to Utrecht's 63%. The value of Eindhoven's forward passes reaches 0.89, while Utrecht's is only 0.67. In midfield control, Eindhoven has an average ball - possession rate of over 62% and 18 offensive - defensive transitions per game. In contrast, Utrecht has a 48% ball - possession rate and 12 offensive - defensive transitions. Eindhoven's players also cover a longer running distance of 110 km, compared to Utrecht's 103 km. And Eindhoven makes 42 high - intensity sprints, more than Utrecht's 35. Visit latest domain Nwgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football stre
      AH
      HOL D1 PSV Eindhoven - FC Utrecht
    • VfB Stuttgart VS Borussia Dortmund Stuttgart has been in decent form offensively lately, with an attack conversion rate of 14.3%, which is higher than the Bundesliga average of 11.2%. However, their xG efficiency stands at 0.82/xG, lower than Dortmund's 1.15/xG. In terms of passing, Dortmund shows a clear edge. Their key pass success rate is 42.7%, 12 percentage points higher than Stuttgart. The value of their passes in the front 30 - meter area reaches 2.3 times per 90 minutes. When it comes to midfield transition, both teams have an average transition speed of 5.2 seconds. But in terms of physical performance under pressure, Dortmund outshines Stuttgart. Dortmund's average running distance under pressure is 118.4 meters, 19 meters more than Stuttgart. Also, their high - intensity sprint count of 28.6 times gives them a dominant advantage. Visit latest domain Nwgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming Dortmund leads in both total tackles (18) and interceptions (
      O/U
      GER D1 VfB Stuttgart - Borussia Dortmund
    • AZ Alkmaar VS Fortuna Sittard Alkmaar has been in excellent form on the offensive end. In their recent performances, they've shown greater efficiency compared to Fortuna Sittard. Over the last several matches, Alkmaar's conversion rate in front of goal stands at 18%, while Fortuna Sittard's is only 12%. The key pass success rate also favors Alkmaar, with 75% compared to 60% of their opponents. In terms of forward passes, Alkmaar averages 3.5 valuable passes per game, while Fortuna Sittard manages only 2.2. Alkmaar also has a clear edge in midfield control. Their average ball - possession rate is over 60%. Moreover, they can complete a counter - attack within 1.5 seconds in 68% of the cases. When it comes to physical exertion, Alkmaar runs more. The whole team covers 110 km in a game, compared to Fortuna Sittard's 100 km. And the number of high - intensity sprints is 150 for Alkmaar, while Fortuna Sittard has 120. Visit latest domain Nwgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live footba
      AH
      HOL D1 AZ Alkmaar - Fortuna Sittard
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.